Tiger Woods is facing Florida prosecutors seeking to subpoena his prescription drug records related to his March DUI arrest; latest reports indicate a subpoena was issued to obtain detailed pharmacy data, including medication type, dosages, and warning labels, as part of the DUI investigation. Several outlets published in April 2026 that prosecutors moved to compel access to Woods’ medication history, with court filings specifying Lewis Pharmacy data from January 1 to March 27, 2026 [multiple outlets cited below].
Key points from recent coverage
- Subpoena aims to obtain prescription records to assess impairment at the time of the crash, including dates, pill counts, dosages, instructions, and warnings about driving [Heavy.com; Florida news outlets cited in articles from early April 2026].[1]
- Prosecutors sought records from Lewis Pharmacy in Palm Beach, detailing prescriptions and usage around the incident window, with a potential impact on legal exposure if medications affected Woods’ ability to drive [WFMD; Essentially Sports summaries].[2][3]
- Woods’ legal team has contested the scope, seeking a hearing on relevance and attempting to limit disclosure of private medical information, arguing privacy and potential irrelevance to the DUI case [CBS Sports; CBS News coverage].[4][6]
- By mid-April 2026, courts had begun allowing some level of production or continuation of the subpoena process, with continued court proceedings and media reporting on the dispute over the records [CBS Sports; TMZ Sports coverage].[5][7]
Context and what this means
- If the subpoena yields corroborating prescription data, prosecutors could use it to argue impairment or to challenge Woods’ statements about medications at the time of the stop. However, the defense is likewise pushing back, asserting privacy protections and arguing the relevance of certain items may be limited. The next court actions and any rulings could shape what information becomes public in the DUI case moving forward [CBS News; CBS Sports; TMZ Sports].[6][7][4]
Would you like a concise timeline of events with exact dates from these reports, or a comparison of what each source claims about the subpoena scope and current court status? I can compile a sourced summary with direct quotes and a short glossary of key legal terms. If you’d prefer, I can also pull up the most recent updates from specific outlets you trust.