Josh Hazlewood delivered a match-winning performance in the 2nd T20I against India, raising the question of whether he is a better bowler than Jasprit Bumrah. During the match at the MCG, Hazlewood was nearly unplayable, dismantling the Indian top order with the new ball.
Hazlewood finished with figures of 3 for 13 in his four overs. His wickets included Shubman Gill, Suryakumar Yadav, and Tilak Varma. His outstanding spell was the key reason for India being restricted to just 125 runs.
Despite India's low total, Jasprit Bumrah failed to replicate a similar impact. He conceded some early runs and ended with figures of 2 for 26. While he did claim two wickets, they did little to affect the outcome as the chase remained manageable for Australia.
"Bumrah is often projected as the best pacer of contemporary cricket."
However, considering their recent performances, the debate arises whether Hazlewood might be the superior all-format bowler at present.
When viewed over their entire careers, Jasprit Bumrah stands out as more efficient, boasting better averages and strike rates across formats compared to Hazlewood.
While Hazlewood shone in the recent T20I, Bumrah’s overall career stats across formats reflect greater consistency and efficiency.
Both bowlers bring unique strengths, but Bumrah’s career impact across all formats currently positions him slightly ahead of Hazlewood.