After a fast-paced first half under the sun at Selhurst Park, Crystal Palace earned a penalty just before the break. Forward Jean-Philippe Mateta stepped up to take the spot kick but saw his initial effort disallowed after encroachment was spotted.
To the anger of opposing fans, the referee ordered a retake instead of awarding a free kick to the defending side. Mateta redeemed himself by converting his second attempt, sparking heated reactions across social media and in the stands.
Many supporters argued that the ruling was inconsistent with similar cases seen earlier in the season. On social media, messages such as “How can he retake that?” and “That’s not fair to the other side” trended among viewers frustrated with the perceived bias.
Others defended the referee’s decision, claiming that the rules dictate a retake if both teams encroach before the penalty is taken.
“The laws of the game state that when both sides encroach, the kick must be retaken. The referee followed the protocol,” one analyst noted during post-match discussion.
Despite the confusion, Crystal Palace maintained control of the match and Mateta’s goal stood as the decisive moment before halftime.
The incident reignited debate over VAR consistency and referee judgment in Premier League fixtures. Commentators suggested that better communication of the ruling during play could have reduced the outrage among fans and players.
“These moments highlight how transparency in officiating decisions matters more than ever,” said a former referee during the post-match broadcast.
Author’s summary: Fans criticized the decision allowing Mateta to retake a disallowed penalty, fueling debate about referee consistency and the clarity of VAR rulings.